A LAST-DITCH attempt to find more Strictly complainants has been made by supporters of actress Amanda Abbington.
The plea on a TV industry workers’ forum came as former Strictly pro Giovanni Pernice gave a confident thumbs up as the probe into his alleged bullying nears its end.
3
A final attempt to find more Strictly complainants has been made by supporters of actress Amanda Abbington in her fight against pro Giovanni PerniceCredit: BBC
3
Amanda broke down in an interview about her Strictly ordealCredit: Channel 4
Giovanni, 33, was seen arriving at a dance studio in Fulham, South West London, yesterday.
He quit the BBC One dance show this year after Sherlock actress Amanda accused him of bullying behaviour — which he denies.
A user of online forum The TV Mindset urged people to come forward, claiming an earlier post had led to others contacting them.
The post said: “Giovanni himself has proclaimed in the press the BBC’s inquiry into his conduct is soon to conclude.
“It is now very time-sensitive indeed in order to receive anyone else’s experiences — and especially those relating to Giovanni.
“With the rise in complaints from those who work(ed) on the show, it is hoped that others with similarly upsetting experiences . . . would feel empowered to also speak up and join this united stance.”
Amanda, 50, broke down in a TV interview about her experiences.
Laura Whitmore and Zara McDermott are among the other celebs to have complained about their treatment on the show.
Amanda Abbington compares Strictly training to ‘the Marines’ saying relationship with Giovanni was ‘disastrously unworkable’
3
Giovanni gives a confident thumbs up as the probe into his alleged bullying nears its endCredit: Doug Seeburg/News Group Newspapers Ltd
Strictly’s Full Scandal So Far
Strictly Come Dancing’s scandal has been growing over the past few months, with several major players speaking out about what went on. Here are the key moments of what’s happened so far
16th May: Giovanni Pernice sensationally quits Strictly Come Dancing after nine years on the show.
17th May: Giovanni becomes the centre of an official investigation after three former partners – believed to be Amanda Abbington, Laura Whitmore and Ranvir Singh – make complaints to the BBC.
16th June: Giovanni releases an official statement vowing to clear his name and denies any wrongdoing.
8th July: Strictly confirms Aljaz Skorjanec will return to the series, replacing Giovanni, after initially quitting the show two years ago.
10th July: Amanda Abbington launches fresh legal proceedings to get the rehearsal footage from her time with Giovanni, after allegedly he refused to release the videos.
13th July: Graziano Di Prima is axed from Strictly for “gross misconduct” after footage of his treatment of Zara McDermott is brought to the attention of the BBC.
Graziano quickly broke his silence, apologising for his behaviour in a statement and saying he “deeply regrets it”, adding his “intense passion and determination to win might have affected his training regime.”
15th July: Strictly bosses implement new duty of care protocols, including having a chaperone present throughout all rehearsals.
16th July: Zara McDermott speaks out publicly for first time. She states while the production team were “amazing to work with”, she found the rehearsal room “completely different”, confirming there’s footage of “certain situations”.
19th July: Anton Du Beke is put under the spotlight for his “1970s attitude” and treatment of female celeb stars, particularly after allegedly referring to 2009 partner Laila Rouass as a “p***” after getting a spray tan.
21st July: Paralympian Will Bayley, who has limb condition arthrogryposis, revealed he was encouraged to leap from a table during a dance routine, despite fears. The stunt caused an injury that forced him to withdraw from the show.
22nd July: MasterChef’s Gregg Wallace admits he broke down in tears and got a nasty stress rash on his face during his time on Strictly in 2014.
23rd July: Celebrity agent Melanie Blake claims she was sexually assaulted by an unnamed pro dancer while backstage on the show, and claims she witnessed ageism, rudeness and a rough treatment to the point of injury.
23rd July: BBC boss Tim Davie breaks his silence on the ongoing allegations against Strictly, saying he is ‘deeply sorry’, adding: “Hundreds of people, be they pros, contestants or crew have been part of it and had a brilliant experience.
“At the same time if someone thinks there was something wrong or they want to talk about their experience then of course we want them to raise that with us. Be in no doubt we will take it seriously, listen and deal with it as appropriate.”
Breaking news: Meghan Markle officially stripped of royal succession rights by King Charles; the Duchess immediately called her mother for “rescue.”
Meghan Markle’s demand for an inheritance from Prince Charles was ultimately cancelled due to various intricate factors that intersected within the realms of royal tradition, legal constraints, and personal dynamics.
The request, which may have seemed reasonable on the surface, triggered a series of deliberations and considerations that led to its eventual withdrawal. To unravel the complexities surrounding this issue, we need to delve deeper into the specifics of royal finances, the nuances of inheritances within the monarchy, and the broader implications of Meghan’s status as a member of the royal family.
First and foremost, it is crucial to recognize that the British royal family operates within a highly structured framework when it comes to financial matters. The funding sources for senior royals are primarily derived from the Sovereign Grant, which is allocated by the government and covers official expenses such as staff salaries, travel costs, and maintenance of royal residences. This system is designed to ensure transparency and accountability in the allocation of public funds to support the monarchy’s activities.
However, inheritances within the royal family are governed by a different set of rules and protocols. While it is not uncommon for members of the royal family to receive inheritances from their relatives, the specifics of such transactions are often shrouded in secrecy and subject to internal negotiations.
In Meghan Markle’s case, her request for an inheritance from Prince Charles raised eyebrows due to the unprecedented nature of the demand and the implications it carried for the established protocols within the royal household.
Moreover, Meghan’s status as a former senior royal who had stepped back from official duties further complicated the situation. Her departure from the royal fold had already sparked debates and speculation about her financial arrangements and future prospects within the royal family.
Against this backdrop, her request for an inheritance from Charles could have been perceived as a calculated move to assert her financial independence and secure her position within the royal hierarchy.
Additionally, the personal dynamics between Meghan Markle and the members of the royal family cannot be overlooked in this context. Tensions and rifts that had emerged during her time as a working royal continued to cast a shadow over her interactions with the royal household.
The dynamics of power, influence, and reputation management played a significant role in shaping the responses to Meghan’s request for an inheritance, highlighting the complexities of navigating personal relationships within the royal family.
Ultimately, the decision to cancel Meghan Markle’s demand for an inheritance from Prince Charles was likely influenced by a combination of these factors. The need to uphold the traditional protocols and values of the monarchy, the complexities of financial arrangements within the royal household, and the personal dynamics at play all converged to lead to the withdrawal of the request.
While the specifics of the discussions and negotiations that took place behind closed doors may remain confidential, the broader implications of this episode shed light on the intricate web of relationships and power dynamics that define the world of the British royal family.
Meghan Markle’s demand for an inheritance from Prince Charles was cancelled due to a complex interplay of factors that encompassed royal traditions, legal constraints, and personal dynamics.
By examining the nuances of royal finances, the protocols of inheritances within the monarchy, and the broader implications of Meghan’s status as a former senior royal, we can gain a deeper understanding of the intricate dynamics that shaped the outcome of this episode.
The cancellation of Meghan’s request serves as a reminder of the complexities and challenges that accompany life within the royal family, highlighting the delicate balance between tradition, modernity, and personal agency in navigating the intricacies of royal life.
Unseen Footage! Dr.Ngozi Okonjo Reveals Meghan’s Emotional Moment As She Receives No Applause During
Meghan Markle’s recent participation in a women’s leadership event in Nigeria’s capital has ignited a firestorm of criticism and debate regarding her suitability as a representative of women in leadership.
What was intended to be an event highlighting the challenges and successes of women in professional roles instead became a focal point for scrutiny over Markle’s punctuality, attire, and the substance of her contributions.
From the outset, Markle’s late arrival and choice of attire drew immediate attention. Observers noted her lack of cultural sensitivity and professionalism, citing her wardrobe choice as inappropriate for the occasion. The delay in her arrival underscored a disconnect between her self-professed role as a leader and the expectations of the event’s organizers and attendees. This initial misstep set a tone of skepticism that would permeate her entire participation in the event.
During her address, Markle focused predominantly on personal anecdotes rather than offering substantive achievements in leadership roles. This approach, likely intended to resonate with the audience on a personal level, instead highlighted a significant gap between her public image and her actual contributions to the field of leadership. The lukewarm reception and lack of enthusiastic applause from the audience further underscored the attendees’ skepticism towards her portrayal as a leader.
Criticism intensified when Markle shifted her focus to discussions on balancing motherhood and career. Her comments were perceived by many as out of touch with the realities faced by working women, especially those who lack the same level of support and resources. Her remarks about employing staff and nannies for childcare further fueled perceptions of privilege and detachment from everyday challenges faced by the majority of working women.
Markle’s attempts to connect with the local culture were also met with criticism. Her shallow remarks on discovering her Nigerian heritage were seen as superficial and insincere. This perceived lack of genuine engagement raised doubts about her suitability as a representative for women in leadership. It highlighted concerns over her motivations and commitment to meaningful advocacy, rather than a sincere effort to understand and connect with the local culture and its unique challenges.
The event, which aimed to empower and inspire women in leadership roles, instead brought Markle’s approach under intense scrutiny. This prompted broader discussions on authenticity and the responsibilities of public figures. Critics argue that public figures like Markle have an obligation to genuinely engage with the issues they champion and to bridge the gap between their public persona and meaningful action.
In conclusion, Meghan Markle’s controversial participation in the Nigerian women’s leadership event has ignited discussions on cultural awareness, leadership substance, and the portrayal of privilege in public forums.
The controversy surrounding her appearance serves as a reminder of the complexities involved in representing diverse communities and the high expectations placed on public figures to authentically engage with issues they advocate.
As debates continue, this event underscores ongoing challenges in bridging the gap between public perception and meaningful engagement on global platforms. Markle’s appearance, intended to inspire, has instead sparked a necessary dialogue on the true nature of leadership and the importance of cultural sensitivity and genuine advocacy.
