Security guard Gavin Plumb has reportedly applied for permission to appeal his convictions, after being sentenced to life in prison.
He was found guilty after his plot to to kidnap, rape and murder former This Morning presenter Holly Willoughby, and jailed for life with a minimum of 16 years.
He is reportedly applying to appeal both his conviction and his sentencing.
A court official told the Mirror: ‘We have received applications to appeal both [his convictions and sentence].’
” alt=”” data-proportion=”true” data-align=”none” data-file-name=”AD_4nXcelpARA4JWoXyTz8LTqjUiRd3SUTM8xtRUa9bACDxPZ7pZAinBK3E6RCQtnCfdMYctuCNM5ziaL6_LkuhIj17c1L6rQsl0vRtCijZS4jT5qy8_GlnQGPq205hrrfbUuaMaa4x9xmu1ksoV-PP8_UiNbvUAkeyDeI4ZJGmOo3UJWm_gnX2EQ.png?w=790&ssl=1″ data-file-size=”0″ data-origin=”,” data-size=”,” data-rotate=”” data-percentage=”auto,auto” data-lazy-src=”https://newsin24h.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/AD_4nXcelpARA4JWoXyTz8LTqjUiRd3SUTM8xtRUa9bACDxPZ7pZAinBK3E6RCQtnCfdMYctuCNM5ziaL6_LkuhIj17c1L6rQsl0vRtCijZS4jT5qy8_GlnQGPq205hrrfbUuaMaa4x9xmu1ksoV-PP8_UiNbvUAkeyDeI4ZJGmOo3UJWm_gnX2EQ.png” />
Earlier this month, a judge sentenced Plumb to a lengthy prison term for his ‘depraved and vile’ plans, stating that despite his crimes involving only one woman, he poses a serious risk to all women.
” alt=”” data-proportion=”true” data-align=”none” data-file-name=”AD_4nXdmL3IyDsGQI6APYMDue7y1KMrslBgZujCuSvv1JGarxXCf-_unzzPKHyolrQJhucViZUmivbbI8ESf29d4OYZRNfaDKTXIH5RlqCMgzrgizXGNcmLq2nBqS6p0OOt46jIEu8jxQ33ECEz5kRbTbKpgqWFykeyDeI4ZJGmOo3UJWm_gnX2EQ.png?w=790&ssl=1″ data-file-size=”0″ data-origin=”,” data-size=”,” data-rotate=”” data-percentage=”auto,auto” data-lazy-src=”https://newsin24h.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/AD_4nXdmL3IyDsGQI6APYMDue7y1KMrslBgZujCuSvv1JGarxXCf-_unzzPKHyolrQJhucViZUmivbbI8ESf29d4OYZRNfaDKTXIH5RlqCMgzrgizXGNcmLq2nBqS6p0OOt46jIEu8jxQ33ECEz5kRbTbKpgqWFykeyDeI4ZJGmOo3UJWm_gnX2EQ.png” />
The judge added that Plumb, if released after the minimum term of 16 years – minus the 280 days he spent on remand, taking the total to 15 years and 85 days – would be subject to a permanent licence condition.
” alt=”” data-proportion=”true” data-align=”none” data-file-name=”AD_4nXdMuk3REABzV5DAdtTwL5jCG9ygkgqqDxOkxFtA7u4Nc1Gt40U_Vgz3j09lIjKe4V3EWb3p_7z37cwgSc0KDCDGwPA5NQsmv3TnK5czyPk9iyL-hRdBRAxXfyvEGgN918Ph3icUfrmPXINBVWNKBt4d3dIkeyDeI4ZJGmOo3UJWm_gnX2EQ.png?w=790&ssl=1″ data-file-size=”0″ data-origin=”,” data-size=”,” data-rotate=”” data-percentage=”auto,auto” data-lazy-src=”https://newsin24h.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/AD_4nXdMuk3REABzV5DAdtTwL5jCG9ygkgqqDxOkxFtA7u4Nc1Gt40U_Vgz3j09lIjKe4V3EWb3p_7z37cwgSc0KDCDGwPA5NQsmv3TnK5czyPk9iyL-hRdBRAxXfyvEGgN918Ph3icUfrmPXINBVWNKBt4d3dIkeyDeI4ZJGmOo3UJWm_gnX2EQ.png” />
Mr Justice Edward Murray told him: ‘There is no doubt that if you had genuinely found one or more accomplices who were seriously interested in and had been willing to join you in carrying your plan through then you would have put this plan into action.’
Continuing to give his reasons for imposing the prison term, he continued: ‘Over a number of years, you pursued an unhealthy sexual obsession with Holly Willoughby that led you ultimately to plan over that period to kidnap, to rape and to murder her.
‘You intended to harm her husband and her children as part of your plan.
‘You discussed with Marc and David Nelson and no doubt others in hideous and revolting detail the prolonged sexual violence that you intended to inflict on Ms Willoughby once you abducted her and had her under your control.
‘You had previously been convicted of terrifying offences involving the threat of sexual violence against four different young women – I found you to be dangerous.’
Plumb, 37, was snared after a US undercover police officer infiltrated an online group called Abduct Lovers and became so concerned about Plumb’s posts that evidence was passed to the FBI.
” alt=”” data-proportion=”true” data-align=”none” data-file-name=”AD_4nXeWdIdCdwmhaxeE-HMoS199x7XbV8YkK-CBjg3ytmYJGtYJ7lH3A_194fLneP4XVvnnhKzR1XgGSuAY0PaZ6h9AoSe_Akn8iBmLihHY9dmXDDMkeYXNCSX0VCf8t_TcDilooQ_jkANL-cmNF-McRduAiQczkeyDeI4ZJGmOo3UJWm_gnX2EQ.png?w=790&ssl=1″ data-file-size=”0″ data-origin=”,” data-size=”,” data-rotate=”” data-percentage=”auto,auto” data-lazy-src=”https://newsin24h.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/AD_4nXeWdIdCdwmhaxeE-HMoS199x7XbV8YkK-CBjg3ytmYJGtYJ7lH3A_194fLneP4XVvnnhKzR1XgGSuAY0PaZ6h9AoSe_Akn8iBmLihHY9dmXDDMkeYXNCSX0VCf8t_TcDilooQ_jkANL-cmNF-McRduAiQczkeyDeI4ZJGmOo3UJWm_gnX2EQ.png” />
US law enforcement in turn contacted police in the UK, and when Essex Police officers raided Plumb’s flat in Harlow they found bottles of chloroform and an ‘abduction kit’ complete with cable ties.
Following his conviction, Dancing on Ice star Willoughby, 43, issued a statement, saying: ‘As women we should not be made to feel unsafe going about our daily lives and in our own home.’
Thanking the undercover police and the Crown Prosecution Service ‘for ensuring that justice was done and that the defendant will not be able to harm any more women’, she went on: ‘I would also like to commend the bravery of his previous victims for speaking up at the time. Without their bravery this conviction may not have been possible.’
In a shocking turn of events, security guard Gavin Plumb is seeking permission to appeal his convictions after being sentenced to life in prison. Plumb was found guilty of a heinous plot to kidnap, rape, and murder former This Morning presenter Holly Willoughby. The judge handed down a life sentence with a minimum of 16 years behind bars, citing the depraved nature of his plans.Reports have emerged that Plumb is not only appealing his conviction but also his sentencing. A court official confirmed that applications have been received for both aspects of his case. The judge who presided over the trial described Plumb’s actions as “depraved and vile,” emphasizing that his dangerous intentions posed a serious risk not only to Willoughby but to all women.During the sentencing, Mr. Justice Edward Murray highlighted the disturbing details of Plumb’s obsession with Holly Willoughby, noting his intentions to harm her family as well. The judge expressed concerns that if Plumb were to find accomplices willing to assist him, he would have carried out his horrific plan without hesitation.Plumb’s twisted fantasies were brought to light after an undercover police officer in the US uncovered his online activities in a group called Abduct Lovers. The evidence was shared with the FBI, leading to the involvement of UK law enforcement. A raid on Plumb’s residence revealed chloroform bottles and an abduction kit, underscoring the seriousness of his intentions.Following the conviction, Holly Willoughby spoke out, emphasizing the importance of women feeling safe in their daily lives and homes. She expressed gratitude to law enforcement and the Crown Prosecution Service for ensuring justice was served and preventing further harm. Willoughby also commended the bravery of Plumb’s previous victims for coming forward, enabling the conviction.As this troubling case unfolds, it serves as a stark reminder of the dangers that some individuals pose to society. It highlights the importance of vigilance and the role of law enforcement in protecting individuals from harm. Stay tuned for more updates on this case and other important news stories. Thank you for your continued support.
Follow us to see more useful information, as well as to give us more motivation to update more useful information for you.
Source: USA Today
Traumatised’ Meghan Markle ‘Flew Into Rage At Pa Over The Colour Of Blankets’ & Left ‘Entire Household On The Verge Of Quitting’
MEGHAN Markle reportedly flew into a rage at a PA because blankets were the “wrong shade of red” and her outbursts left her entire staff on the verge of quitting, insiders claimed last night.
It comes after claims the Duchess of Sussex bullied and humiliated aides at Kensington Palace – which she denies.
5
Meghan Markle and Prince Harry reportedly clashed with palace staffCredit: Getty – Contributor
5
Meghan was reportedly not happy with she Harry’s engagement interview, allegedly saying the BBC’s Mishal Husain was not warm enoughCredit: Getty Images
Ahead of her bombshell interview with Oprah Winfrey, royal aides insisted they had bent over backwards to accommodate Meghan.
But according to a report in the Sunday Times, a former aide to one of the most senior members of the royal family claimed “half the staff threatened to quit” over tensions allegedly caused by the Sussexes.
Another Palace source claimed: “The entire household was on the verge of quitting … it was drama, drama, drama with those two.”
The former aide said one incident that caused alarm occurred when Meghan hosted a shooting party at Sandringham for Harry’s friends, shortly after their engagement.
She had ordered personally embroidered red blankets for each guest, but was not happy with what she received.
“When they arrived, they weren’t the right shade of red for Meghan and she went mental at Melissa [Touabti],” the source said,
Melissa was Meghan’s former personal assistant, who is alleged to have left “traumatised” because of Meghan’s volatile behaviour.
Buckingham Palace is investigating allegations Meghan was an “outrageous bully” to her staff before she departed Britain last year.
Meghan also reportedly took issue with the way in which the BBC’s Mishal Husain conducted she and Harry’s engagement interview.
“She complained it hadn’t gone well, that Mishal [Husain] wasn’t empathetic enough, wasn’t warm enough,” said the source.
Shortly before the wedding, Harry is said to have been told off by the Queen for yelling at her royal dresser Angela Kelly following a run-in with Meghan.
She is said to have complained that a tiara she planned to wear could not be produced for an unscheduled hair appointment.
One source told The Telegraph: “Angela told Harry it was priceless and couldn’t suddenly be handed over at short notice.
“He was furious and shouted: ‘What Meghan wants, Meghan gets.’ Suffice to say it didn’t go down too well.”
It was further claimed Meghan had been given first choice from the Crown Jewels – but that she had still been unhappy.
The insider claimed: “They insisted that they had the same inflation-adjusted budget for the wedding as William and Kate – she got the choir she wanted, the dress, the carriage procession, the tiara – she got everything she wanted but it still wasn’t enough.
“She was constantly looking for reasons to say she had been deprived. Also, she wanted drama from the very beginning.”
Harry and Meghan tied the knot at St George’s Chapel at Windsor Castle in 2018 – with Telegraph claiming the lead up to the wedding was “hugely stressful” for everyone involved.
5
There was drama over Meghan Markle’s tiara, it has been reportedCredit: AFP and licensors
5
The couple sat down with Oprah for a wide-ranging interview to be broadcast tomorrowCredit: AP:Associated Press
5
The couple quit the UK after stepping back from the Royal FamilyCredit: Getty Images – Getty
The string of claims emerged this week as the couple get set to have their tell-all interview with Oprah aired tomorrow.
The Royal Family is braced for more bombshell claims in Monday’s broadcast amid an escalating war of words.
And aides said the Queen has not been given an advance copy of Harry and Meghan’s chat with Oprah Winfrey – instead “everyone will watch at the same time”.
The Duchess of Sussex accused Buckingham Palace of spreading lies about her, plunging the the family into its worst crisis in decades.
Senior Royals have reportedly urged for “calm amid the storm” ahead of the bombshell interview which will be aired this weekend.
The interview, conducted by talk-show powerhouse Oprah Winfrey, will be aired on CBS in the US on Sunday night, and then in the UK on ITV on Monday.
SHUT THE F**K UP! Meg Screamed At Zara’s Unbelievable Question: ‘U’VE NEVER BEEN PREGNANT HAVE YOU?’
Recent remarks by Zara Tindle on a podcast have reignited debates regarding the authenticity of Meghan Markle’s pregnancies.
Tindle’s comments have fueled speculation about whether Meghan’s children, Archie and Lilibet, were actually carried by her or if other scenarios, such as surrogacy or the non-existence of the children, are at play. Despite these sensational claims, there is no credible evidence to support these theories.
The public is divided into three main theories about Meghan Markle’s pregnancies. Some accept her narrative without question, while others speculate that surrogates may have been involved or even question the existence of her children.
This division highlights the ongoing controversy surrounding Meghan’s motherhood. Observers have pointed to perceived inconsistencies in Meghan’s pregnancy appearances, such as changes in the size and position of her baby bump, which have further fueled doubts and speculation.
Tindle’s comments have intensified scrutiny of Meghan’s narrative, suggesting that details about her pregnancies might have been exaggerated or fabricated. However, no specific evidence was provided to substantiate these claims, leaving the debate largely speculative. This renewed controversy underscores the complex and often contentious nature of public perception regarding Meghan Markle and her family.
Compounding the issue are discrepancies in timelines and narratives associated with Meghan and Harry. Critics have raised questions about their authenticity and intentions, arguing that they may be exploiting their royal connections for personal gain without making substantive contributions.
The royal family’s trust in the Tindalls contrasts sharply with the more negative public perception of Meghan and Harry, reflecting the complexities and tensions within royal relationships.
Meghan and Harry have recently announced plans for a family-focused event at the Invictus Games, emphasizing their commitment to family involvement. Their upcoming preparations, including a recent trip to Nigeria, are part of their efforts to maintain a strong family presence. This move comes amid ongoing debates and scrutiny of their public and personal lives.
In summary, Zara Tindle’s recent comments have reignited speculation about Meghan Markle’s pregnancies, leading to renewed public debate. Despite the sensational nature of these claims, there is no concrete evidence to support them. As Meghan and Harry continue to navigate public scrutiny and plan their involvement in the Invictus Games, the controversies surrounding their family life persist, highlighting the broader complexities of their public image and royal connections.
