It came after a resurfaced remark to his celebrity partner at the time came to light
STRICTLY Come Dancing professional-turned-judge Anton Du Beke brushed off the recent drama surrounding his role on the BBC show as he took to the stage with Giovanni Pernice.
His celebrations came after The Sun reported how Anton would now face a legal probe over a historic row with former celebrity partner Laila Rouass, 53.
And what has been dubbed “1970s behaviour.”
His best pal Giovanni, 33, quit the BBC show earlier this year.
He is currently under investigation by the BBC over misconduct after complaints were filed by several of his former celebrity dance partners.
The same investigation also saw his fellow Italian professional Graziano Di Prima axed after allegations of “physical incidents” towards show partner Zara McDermott, 27.
Yet as he focussed on his latest dance show, Anton enjoyed some respite from the scandals.
He was seen on-stage in north Wales wrapping the show with Giovanni, before the crowd sung Happy Birthday to him.
Giovanni led the dance fans in their vocals and enjoyed a playful jig with Anton as the song ended.
The ticket-holders were then quick to reward the duo – dressed in matching bowler hats and sparkling black shirts – with a huge round of applause.Anton posted a clip of the emotional moment to his page on X and wrote: “Ah, my loves, such a wonderful birthday serenade from Llandudno!
“Thank you to everyone who has sent me birthday wishes today.
“All my love, Anton XX.”
Social media users this week dug up Anton’s 2009 comment — made in response to Laila having a spray tan — and asked why he wasn’t sacked.
Laila stormed out of at the time. Anton, 58, later apologised. BBC bosses stood by him and in 2021 made him a £200,000-a-year judge.
October 2023: Amanda abruptly withdraws from Strictly having already missed one live show. Her departure is announced in a vague BBC statement that ‘wishes her the best’.
Giovanni posts a short message on social media addressing the exit, which read: “Amanda… I am so sad we can’t continue but I am proud of what we achieved and I am sending you so much love.”
Amanda then shares her own farewell statement on Instagram thanking co-stars but failing to mention Gio.
Giovanni’s dad Piero insists there were no signs of a fall out and the pairing could have gone all the way. He praised his son as kind and polite.
November 2023: Giovanni is reportedly gutted by the situation and is considering his Strictly future as questions are raised about his conduct.
January 2024: Amanda’s PTSD diagnosis comes to light and she demands CCTV from rehearsals to prove that Giovanni’s training methods weren’t acceptable.
The BBC issues a statement defending its duty of care to contestants, insisting it takes any claims of wrongdoing very seriously.
The Corporation stands by its man after emergency meeting
March 2024: Giovanni publicly states he has no intention of leaving Strictly in a TV interview with close pal Anton du Beke.
Ranvir Singh and Laura Whitmore enter the picture. Allegedly the two celebs, who were both previously partnered with Giovanni on Strictly, didn’t feel the BBC took their issues with his methods seriously enough.
The pair have a closed meeting with Amanda where tears are said to be shed.
May 2024: We reveal Giovanni is leaving the programme after having talks with show bosses
He leaves the country with girlfriend Molly Brown on holiday
The BBC launches an internal investigation after three complainants instruct lawyers. A source describes it as a “nightmare situation”.
She has been inundated with support, and is said to be considering legal action.
One source said: “Anton has a very 1970s attitude and can be abrasive.
“The lines are becoming increasingly blurred as to what is acceptable or not, and of course, some people have found him fine to work with.
“But there were murmurings of discontent when he was a dancer. Yet the BBC promoted him. It is all quite strange.”
A source close to Anton said: “His comment was dealt with at the time and he wants to move on.”
Meanwhile, Strictly’s head judge Shirley Ballas has thrown her support behind Anton after he was the “fourth name in the misconduct probe.”
Shirley – who works closely alongside Anton – took to her Instagram account to send her love on his special day.
Posting a snap of the pair together, Shirley said: “Happiest of birthdays to the king @mrantondubeke.
“See you very soon.”
The star then shared a video of the two dancing on the floor of the BBC set.
Anton joined the BBC dance show for its first series in 2004.
He became part of the judging panel in 2019.
Follow us to see more useful information, as well as to give us more motivation to update more useful information for you.
Source: CNN
Maria Shriver Loses Brand Deals Worth Millions After Her Negative Comments On Harrison Butker’s Speech
In a surprising twist of events that intertwines media, social commentary, and sports, Maria Shriver has faced significant backlash, resulting in the loss of brand deals worth millions of dollars. This comes after her public criticism of Harrison Butker’s commencement speech at Benedictine College. Shriver, a journalist and member of the Kennedy family, is renowned for her advocacy on women’s issues and her influential presence in media. However, her recent comments have sparked a divisive reaction, affecting her partnerships with major brands.
Harrison Butker, kicker for the Kansas City Chiefs, delivered a commencement speech that stirred controversy with its strong views on gender roles, faith, and society. Criticizing various modern social movements and suggesting that women should primarily embrace roles as wives and mothers, Butker’s speech was seen by many as a step back in the ongoing dialogue about gender equality. Maria Shriver took to social media to voice her disagreement, highlighting the speech’s potential harm to the perception of women’s roles in society.
In her response, Shriver questioned the implications of Butker’s message, particularly his views on women’s life choices. Her rebuttal on X (formerly Twitter) was both a defense of modern women’s achievements beyond domestic roles and a critique of Butker’s call for a return to traditionalism. She argued that such rhetoric undermines the progress made towards gender equality and dismisses the diverse roles women can—and do—choose to pursue.
Following her public comments, several of Shriver’s endorsements came under scrutiny. Brands that previously aligned with her strong, progressive stance on women’s rights found themselves at the center of a heated public debate. The controversy led to a reassessment of their partnerships with Shriver, resulting in the termination of deals reportedly worth millions of dollars. This backlash highlights the increasingly complex nature of public figures endorsing or criticizing social and political views, where a single statement can lead to significant economic repercussions.
The brands involved have not publicly condemned Shriver’s views but have opted to distance themselves to avoid further controversy. This decision reflects a broader corporate tendency to maintain neutrality in polarized social or political issues, especially when financial stakes and public image are at risk. The move has sparked a debate about the balance between a brand’s values and its survival tactics in a hyper-connected world where consumer reactions can be swift and impactful.
This incident underscores the precarious position of public figures like Shriver, who leverage their platforms to influence social discourse but must also navigate the risks of such visibility. It raises questions about freedom of speech, the responsibilities of influencers, and the expectations of brands that engage with them. Moreover, it highlights the potential consequences of speaking out on contentious issues, illustrating how quickly professional relationships can be affected by public and corporate reactions to personal stances.
The public response to Shriver’s situation has been mixed. Some applaud her courage in standing by her convictions despite the personal and professional costs, viewing her as a martyr for women’s rights and free expression. Others criticize her for what they see as an unnecessary attack on a speech that aligns with Butker’s and, by extension, some of the public’s values. This division mirrors the larger societal split over gender roles, free speech, and the role of public figures in shaping societal norms.
Shriver’s ordeal is a powerful reminder of the influence wielded by celebrities and media figures. It also serves as a cautionary tale about the volatility of public opinion and the rapid pace at which it can change. As society grapples with these issues, the narratives shaped by public figures will undoubtedly continue to influence cultural and social dynamics significantly.
Maria Shriver’s loss of brand deals following her comments on Harrison Butker’s speech is a complex tale of media, morality, and money. It highlights the challenges faced by those in the spotlight who wish to speak out on issues they are passionate about, while also maintaining their livelihood. As the dust settles, the incident serves as a stark reminder of the powerful interplay between celebrity influence, corporate interests, and societal values in shaping the modern cultural landscape.
“I’d Do It For Free”: Jason Aldean Rejects $1 Million Offer to Sing National Anthem During Super Bowl
Aldean’s Heartfelt Gesture Echoes the True Spirit of Country Music and Patriotism.
Jason Aldean, one of country music’s leading lights, recently turned heads not just for his powerhouse vocals but for a gesture that showcased his sheer love for his country. The country superstar is not new to headlines. With a career spanning over two decades, hit tracks, and numerous accolades, Aldean knows how to stay relevant. However, this time it’s not his music but his dedication to the spirit of America that has captured everyone’s attention.
News broke out that Jason was offered a staggering $1 million to sing the National Anthem during the upcoming Super Bowl, an honor many artists would jump at. The Super Bowl is America’s most-watched annual sporting event, with millions of viewers from across the globe tuning in not just for the athletic prowess on display, but also for its halftime show and other performances, which frequently feature top-tier talent from the music industry.
Given the scale and grandeur of the event, the compensation offered to artists for their performances is understandably substantial. It’s a recognition not only of their talent but also of the value they bring to the table in terms of attracting and retaining viewership. But for Jason Aldean, the honor of singing the national anthem for his country at such a pivotal event held more value than any paycheck.
“I’d do it for free,” said Aldean, when news about the offer became public. This statement was not a mere off-the-cuff remark. It stemmed from Aldean’s genuine affection for his homeland and his desire to give back. “It’s not about the money,” Aldean continued, “It’s about the pride, the honor, and the joy of singing for my countrymen at such a cherished event.”
Such a gesture was met with admiration and respect from fans and colleagues alike. In an era where many often question the intent behind celebrities’ actions, wondering if they’re merely PR stunts, Aldean’s genuine gesture stands out as heartfelt and sincere.
Fellow country artist, Miranda Lambert, took to Twitter to commend Aldean: “This is why country music stands tall. It’s about roots, pride, and love for our nation. Hats off, Jason.”
Moreover, this isn’t the first time Aldean’s patriotism has come to the fore. Over the years, he’s been involved in numerous charitable endeavors supporting American veterans, showcasing his respect and gratitude to those who’ve served.
However, it’s not just about the grand gestures. Those close to Aldean often speak about the smaller, day-to-day ways he showcases his love for America – be it a cap donned in support of American troops or a quiet moment of respect whenever the national anthem plays.
The question that arises now is, will Jason Aldean actually take the stage at the Super Bowl? With or without the million-dollar paycheck, his performance would undoubtedly be a memorable one. It’s not just about the vocals or the music; it’s about the sentiment, the emotion, and the connection he shares with every American watching.
The Super Bowl organizers have yet to confirm the final lineup, but one thing is certain: If Jason Aldean does take the stage, it’ll be a performance driven by passion and pride, not monetary incentives.
In a world that often seems divided, Aldean’s gesture serves as a timely reminder. It underscores the values of unity, pride, and genuine affection. As the Super Bowl approaches, perhaps there’s a lesson in there for all of us: sometimes, it’s not about the price tag but about the love and pride one carries in their heart.
Country music, at its core, has always been about storytelling, about genuine emotion, and about the heartland. Jason Aldean, with his recent gesture, has just added another memorable chapter to this rich tapestry, reminding us all about the true spirit of America.
